Skeptive

  • Sources
    • Browse Sources
  • Disputes
    • Browse Disputes
    • Hottest Disputes
    • Newest Disputes
    • Incomplete Disputes
    • Add a New Dispute
  • Login/Join
  • View Dispute
  • Add Support
  • History
  • Tweet
  • Is this dispute interesting? Yes No

User Poll

Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel?

Categories

  • Politics & Law

Keywords

  • Israel
  • terrorism
  • palestine
  • west bank
  • gaza
  • Samaria

Summary

  • Posted: northtriclimate on Jan 04, 2012
  • Last Activity: skeptive on Jan 04, 2012
  • Views: 130 times

Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel?

  • No

    PREDICTED RATING
    • 3
    • clear
    • clear
    • clear
    • clear
    • clear

    fpif.org (2 statements)

    Two Justifications for Terrorism: A Moral Legal Response | FPIF

    The argument for Palestinian terrorism fails for at least five reasons.

    Arguments in favor of targeting “non-innocent” settlers, and suicide bombing, do not withstand such legal and moral analysis.

    View source report for fpif.org
    • 0
    • clear
    • clear
    • clear
    • clear
    • clear

    ucl.ac.uk (1 statement)

    SaulTerrorism

    Arguments in favor of targeting “non-innocent” settlers, and suicide bombing, do not withstand such legal and moral analysis.

    View source report for ucl.ac.uk

     

  • Yes

    • 0
    • clear
    • clear
    • clear
    • clear
    • clear

    Ted Honderich (British philosopher) (1 statement)

    Two Justifications for Terrorism: A Moral Legal Response | FPIF

    A related but distinct justification for terrorism is expounded by the British philosopher Ted Honderich, who defends Palestinian terrorism against Israel as a moral right—“terrorism for humanity”—and as the only effective means for freeing Palestinians from Israeli domination.

    View source report for Ted Honderich (British philosopher)

     

No

fpif.org

Two Justifications for Terrorism: A Moral Legal Response | FPIF

The argument for Palestinian terrorism fails for at least five reasons.

Two Justifications for Terrorism: A Moral Legal Response | FPIF

Arguments in favor of targeting “non-innocent” settlers, and suicide bombing, do not withstand such legal and moral analysis.

ucl.ac.uk

SaulTerrorism

Arguments in favor of targeting “non-innocent” settlers, and suicide bombing, do not withstand such legal and moral analysis.

Yes

Ted Honderich (British philosopher)

Two Justifications for Terrorism: A Moral Legal Response | FPIF

A related but distinct justification for terrorism is expounded by the British philosopher Ted Honderich, who defends Palestinian terrorism against Israel as a moral right—“terrorism for humanity”—and as the only effective means for freeing Palestinians from Israeli domination.

  • Get Skeptive Tools
  • About Skeptive
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact

© 2013 Skeptive. Visit us on Facebook