False

theness.com

NeuroLogica Blog » Eye Evolution and Irreducible Complexity

I had asserted a well-established biological fact – the eye is not irreducibly complex.

NeuroLogica Blog » Eye Evolution and Irreducible Complexity

The point of these living examples is to refute the claim that the eye is irreducibly complex – that if it were any simpler it could not function, or more specifically could not confer an evolutionary advantage to the host.

NeuroLogica Blog » Eye Evolution and Irreducible Complexity

It simply demonstrates that simpler eyes, all the way down to a patch of light sensitive cells, could work and provide an adaptive function – therefore the eye is not irreducibly complex.

Richard Dawkins (biologist)

PBS: Think Tank: Transcript for "Talking about Evolution with Richard Dawkins"

So I mean, there are things which youcould imagine which are irreducibly complex, but the eye is not oneof them.

therelativelyinterestingblog.blogspot.com

Irreducible Complexity, Intelligent Design, Evolution, and The Eye | Relatively Interesting

This, then, demonstrates that the eye is not irreducibly complex, does not provide evidence for the falsification of evolution, and does not require an intelligent designer.

blog.davidaugust.com

David August: Human Eye is Not Irreducibly Complex

Human Eye is Not Irreducibly Complex

True

changinglivesonline.org

Evidence against Evolution (concise and short)

No mechanism has been put forward that even begins to explain how something like the human eye could have been produced by time, chance, natural selection and mutation.