northtriclimate

January 04, 2012
20:56	northtriclimate	True or False? "Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 resulted in more violence against Israel." Changed dispute from “True or False? "He also fails to mention that Israels withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 a pullback to the 1967 border in that area resulted in more violence against Israel, undermining his implicit claim that violence would stop if only Israel would withdraw."” to “True or False? "Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 resulted in more violence against Israel."”
20:53	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No” Arguments in favor of targeting “non-innocent” settlers, and suicide bombing, do not withstand such legal and moral analysis. Source: fpif.org
20:49	northtriclimate	Is Israel committing genocide against the Palestinians? Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No” But Palestinians are not experiencing genocide, extermination, or a threat to their survival as grave as that anticipated by the law of necessity. Source: fpif.org
20:48	northtriclimate	True or False? "First, Palestinians do not face a “grave and imminent peril” of the kind envisaged as “necessity” under international law (as it applies to State conduct)." Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True” First, Palestinians do not face a “grave and imminent peril” of the kind envisaged as “necessity” under international law (as it applies to State conduct). Source: fpif.org
20:48	northtriclimate	True or False? "First, Palestinians do not face a “grave and imminent peril” of the kind envisaged as “necessity” under international law (as it applies to State conduct)." Added dispute: True or False? "First, Palestinians do not face a “grave and imminent peril” of the kind envisaged as “necessity” under international law (as it applies to State conduct)."
20:48	northtriclimate	True or False? "First, Palestinians do not face a “grave and imminent peril” of the kind envisaged as “necessity” under international law (as it applies to State conduct)." Added Viewpoint : “True” to True or False? "First, Palestinians do not face a “grave and imminent peril” of the kind envisaged as “necessity” under international law (as it applies to State conduct)."
20:48	northtriclimate	True or False? "First, Palestinians do not face a “grave and imminent peril” of the kind envisaged as “necessity” under international law (as it applies to State conduct)." Added Viewpoint : “False” to True or False? "First, Palestinians do not face a “grave and imminent peril” of the kind envisaged as “necessity” under international law (as it applies to State conduct)."
20:44	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Changed Viewpoint “True” to “Yes”
20:44	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Changed Viewpoint “False” to “No”
20:44	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Changed dispute from “True or False? "A related but distinct justification for terrorism is expounded by the British philosopher Ted Honderich, who defends Palestinian terrorism against Israel as a moral right—“terrorism for humanity”—and as the only effective means for freein” to “Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel?”
20:43	northtriclimate	Are Israel's settlements in the West Bank legal? Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No” It should be overridden by a new letter stating that the US considers every post-1967 settlement illegal. Source: Guardian (UK newspaper)
20:42	northtriclimate	Do Israeli settlements in the West Bank justify terrorism? Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Yes” Until Israel pulls back to the 1967 borders, give or take some land swaps, under international agreement, Palestinian resistance will continue – and other states will be entitled to support it. Source: Guardian (UK newspaper)
20:42	northtriclimate	Do Israeli settlements in the West Bank justify terrorism? Completed dispute
20:42	northtriclimate	Added Page To Source: What Obama must tell Bibi \| Jonathan Steele \| Comment is free \| The Guardian
20:40	northtriclimate	True or False? "Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 resulted in more violence against Israel." Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True” He also fails to mention that Israels withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 a pullback to the 1967 border in that area resulted in more violence against Israel, undermining his implicit claim that violence would stop if only Israel would withdraw. Source: honestreporting.com
20:40	northtriclimate	True or False? "Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 resulted in more violence against Israel." Added dispute: True or False? "Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 resulted in more violence against Israel."
20:40	northtriclimate	True or False? "Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 resulted in more violence against Israel." Added Viewpoint : “True” to True or False? "Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 resulted in more violence against Israel."
20:40	northtriclimate	True or False? "Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 resulted in more violence against Israel." Added Viewpoint : “False” to True or False? "Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 resulted in more violence against Israel."
20:40	northtriclimate	Added Page To Source: Guardian Columnist Justifies Terror - honest reporting
20:38	northtriclimate	Are Israel's settlements in the West Bank legal? Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No” It is beyond doubt that Palestinians suffer from an oppressive Israeli military occupation, unlawful Israeli settlements, economic privations, and serious rights violations. Source: fpif.org
20:37	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No” The argument for Palestinian terrorism fails for at least five reasons. Source: fpif.org
20:37	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Completed dispute
20:37	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Yes” A related but distinct justification for terrorism is expounded by the British philosopher Ted Honderich, who defends Palestinian terrorism against Israel as a moral right—“terrorism for humanity”—and as the only effective means for freeing Palestinians f Source: fpif.org
20:37	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Added dispute: Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel?
20:37	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Added Viewpoint : “Yes” to Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel?
20:37	northtriclimate	Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel? Added Viewpoint : “No” to Are Palestinians justified in using terrorism against Israel?
20:37	northtriclimate	Added Page To Source: Two Justifications for Terrorism: A Moral Legal Response \| FPIF
20:32	northtriclimate	Are Israel's settlements in the West Bank legal? Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Yes” Israeli settlements in the West Bank are legal both under international law and . the agreements between Israel and the Palestinians. Source: likud.nl
20:32	northtriclimate	Added Page To Source: Are Israeli settlements legal?
20:08	northtriclimate	Is there such an animal as a 'bigfoot' or 'sasquatch'? Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Yes” The BFRO, and its members, take the former view. Source: Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization