January 11, 2012
| 11:36 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”It is much more difficult to estimate the potential effects of regular heavy use... our findings do suggest an accelerated decline in pulmonary function with heavy use." Source: thechart.blogs.cnn.com |
|
| 11:36 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”Subjects who smoked larger amounts of marijuana, which Pletcher described as smoking one joint per day, did show evidence of reduced pulmonary function, and he stressed that his study results are not intended to encourage people to use marijuana. Source: thechart.blogs.cnn.com |
|
| 11:36 |
banksyboy79
|
Added dispute: True or False? "Subjects who smoked larger amounts of marijuana, which Pletcher described as smoking one joint per day, did show evidence of reduced pulmonary function, and he stressed that his study results are not intended to encourage people to use mar |
|
| 11:36 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Viewpoint : “True” to True or False? "Subjects who smoked larger amounts of marijuana, which Pletcher described as smoking one joint per day, did show evidence of reduced pulmonary function, and he stressed that his study results are not intended to encourage people to use mar |
|
| 11:36 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Viewpoint : “False” to True or False? "Subjects who smoked larger amounts of marijuana, which Pletcher described as smoking one joint per day, did show evidence of reduced pulmonary function, and he stressed that his study results are not intended to encourage people to use mar |
|
| 11:36 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Page To Source: Study: Occasional pot smoking not as damaging as cigarettes – - CNN.com Blogs |
|
| 11:27 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No”Because they are not Christians Source: biblebelievers.com |
|
| 11:26 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Yes”However, when a person comes to understand the theory that is embodied in the terminology they can not help but find proof of the Trinity throughout the Bible. Source: biblebelievers.com |
|
| 11:26 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Merged Viewpoint: Yes”Since God is a triune being, theologians use the word Trinity to represent the complex doctrine through which man comprehends His existence Source: biblebelievers.com |
Undone |
| 11:25 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Merged Viewpoint: Yes”Mystery: The triune God is totally unlike anything in our world, and therefore greater than anything we can comprehend: Rom. Source: blueletterbible.org |
Undone |
| 11:25 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Merged Viewpoint: Yes”Truth: All those who wish to worship and love God must seek to know Him as He is in truth, for God, as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, is truth: John 4:24; 14:6, 14:17; 15:26; 16:13. Source: blueletterbible.org |
Undone |
| 11:24 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Yes”Therefore, the Bible does teach the Trinity. Source: blueletterbible.org |
|
| 11:24 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Yes”IX. Conclusion: The Bible teaches the Trinity Source: blueletterbible.org |
|
| 11:22 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Yes”While the word Trinity is not in the Bible, the substance of the doctrine is definitely biblical. Source: blueletterbible.org |
|
| 11:22 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Page To Source: Blue Letter Bible - Commentaries - Robert Bowman - The Biblical Basis of the Doctrine of the Trinity |
|
| 11:22 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Merged Viewpoint: No”However they paint the trinity doctrine and however it is pedaled and packaged, it is a false doctrine and is a pagan heresy. Source: jesus-messiah.com |
Undone |
| 11:19 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Merged Viewpoint: No”The son is just that, he is the Son of God, not God himself. Source: heaven.net.nz |
Undone |
| 11:19 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Merged Viewpoint: No”But the truth is that the only true God is the Father. Source: heaven.net.nz |
Undone |
| 11:17 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No”The Trinity Doctrine is not taught anywhere in scripture, but trinities were common in Paganism and were prominent in Egypt and Babylon. Source: heaven.net.nz |
|
| 11:17 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Page To Source: The Trinity Doctrine. True or False ? |
|
| 11:17 |
banksyboy79
|
Changed Viewpoint “True” to “Yes” |
|
| 11:17 |
banksyboy79
|
Changed Viewpoint “False” to “No” |
|
| 11:17 |
banksyboy79
|
Changed dispute from “True or False? "But they are wrong in denying that God is a Triune God."” to “Is God a trinity?” |
|
| 11:16 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “Merged Viewpoint: No”Perhaps the largest number have been deceived into believing God is a "Trinity." Source: reluctant-messenger.com |
Undone |
| 11:16 |
banksyboy79
|
Completed dispute |
|
| 11:15 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No”Since the doctrine is unscriptural, it took an emperor to make Christianity start embracing the concept. Source: reluctant-messenger.com |
|
| 11:15 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No”The doctrine of the Trinity itself, however, is not a Biblical Doctrine. Source: reluctant-messenger.com |
|
| 11:15 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No”Certainly, it cannot be denied that not only the word "Trinity", but even the EXPLICIT IDEA of the Trinity is absent from the apostolic witness of the faith.. Source: reluctant-messenger.com |
|
| 11:14 |
banksyboy79
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No”Most theologians know that the Trinity doctrine is not scriptural. Source: reluctant-messenger.com |
|
| 11:14 |
banksyboy79
|
Completed dispute |
|