June 29, 2012
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”The bible does have some worth while information related to history but is certainly not 100% reliable and has many things that have been shown to be wrong. Source: hatefulatheist.tumblr.com |
Undone |
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added dispute: True or False? "The bible does have some worth while information related to history but is certainly not 100% reliable and has many things that have been shown to be wrong." |
|
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added Viewpoint : “True” to True or False? "The bible does have some worth while information related to history but is certainly not 100% reliable and has many things that have been shown to be wrong." |
|
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added Viewpoint : “False” to True or False? "The bible does have some worth while information related to history but is certainly not 100% reliable and has many things that have been shown to be wrong." |
|
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”The bible certainly isn’t harmonious by any means and has many contradictions throughout. Source: hatefulatheist.tumblr.com |
|
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added dispute: Does the Bible contain any contradictions? |
|
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added Viewpoint : “True” to Does the Bible contain any contradictions? |
|
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added Viewpoint : “False” to Does the Bible contain any contradictions? |
|
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No”The bible is not scientifically accurate, miracle stories alone absolutely contradict science. Source: hatefulatheist.tumblr.com |
|
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added Page To Source: The Atheist That Hates - Jehovah’s Witnesses teachings: The Bible was written over a 1,600-year period. Its writers lived at different times and came from many walks of life. Some were farmers, fishermen, and shepherds. Others were prophets, judges, and k |
|
| 10:02 |
sanctum
|
Added Source: hatefulatheist.tumblr.com |
|
| 10:01 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”But the Bible is not against science. Source: blogs.navpress.com |
|
| 10:01 |
sanctum
|
Added dispute: True or False? "But the Bible is not against science." |
|
| 10:01 |
sanctum
|
Added Viewpoint : “True” to True or False? "But the Bible is not against science." |
|
| 10:01 |
sanctum
|
Added Viewpoint : “False” to True or False? "But the Bible is not against science." |
|
| 10:01 |
sanctum
|
Added Page To Source: NavPress Blog - Barry Sneed Blog - Discipleship Inside Out |
|
| 10:01 |
sanctum
|
Added Source: blogs.navpress.com |
|
| 09:55 |
sanctum
|
Changed dispute from “True or False? "The Bible’s text is inspired by God in a way that used selected humans to write its original words (even to each letter in every word), resulting in the precise message that God intended for us to know."” to “True or False? "The Bible’s text is inspired by God."” |
|
| 09:53 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”Whenever it is used with an ordinal (1, 2, 1st, 2nd, etc.), it always means a specific day, an ordinary24-hour day. Source: Institute for Creation Research |
|
| 09:52 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “No”The movement from “simple to complex” may appear to follow evolution’s theory, but the specific order (water > land > plants > stellar and planetary bodies > birds and fish > land animals > man) most emphatically does not. Source: Institute for Creation Research |
|
| 09:51 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”Any reader would understand that the author of those pages intended to convey a normal six-day creation, involving God’s supernatural intervention both to create (something from nothing) and to make and shape (something basic into something more complex). Source: Institute for Creation Research |
|
| 09:51 |
sanctum
|
Added Page To Source: Creation Was 24/6 and Recent |
|
| 09:50 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”Genesis Is Historically True Source: Institute for Creation Research |
|
| 09:50 |
sanctum
|
Added Page To Source: Genesis Is Historically True |
|
| 09:50 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”Genesis Is Historically True Source: Institute for Creation Research |
|
| 09:50 |
sanctum
|
Added dispute: Is the Bible's book of Genesis historically accurate? |
|
| 09:50 |
sanctum
|
Added Viewpoint : “True” to Is the Bible's book of Genesis historically accurate? |
|
| 09:50 |
sanctum
|
Added Viewpoint : “False” to Is the Bible's book of Genesis historically accurate? |
|
| 09:50 |
sanctum
|
Added Statement To Viewpoint: “True”The Bible has proven to be more historically and archaeologically accurate than any other ancient book. Source: Institute for Creation Research |
|
| 09:50 |
sanctum
|
Added dispute: True or False? "The Bible has proven to be more historically and archaeologically accurate than any other ancient book." |
|